LIVE
Tamil Nadu assembly election results: TVK set to emerge as single largest partyNews On AIRElection Commission Begins Hearing On TMC Ownership Dispute Between Mamata, Ritabrata FactionsETV BharatBJP steps up preparations for Nagaon Lok Sabha bypoll, MLA claims 2-lakh victory marginIndia Today NENews On AIR | May 4, 2026 5:46 PMNews On AIRTwo phase polling in West Bengal to be held on 23rd and 29th of next monthNews On AIRIndia's electoral process among most transparent in world: CEC Gyanesh KumarThe HinduUP Assembly Election 2027: BJP core group meets in Lucknow, discusses poll strategy, organisation plansIndia TV NewsBJP UP core group discusses 2027 poll strategy, governance campaignsDaily PioneerBJP core group meets in Lucknow to discuss UP polls, org plansThe Siasat DailyBJP UP core group meets to chalk out 2027 poll strategy, focus on welfare, Gen ZThe Economic Times
8010003355
Main Menu

Delhi court stays NBWs against Kejriwal, others

Delhi court stays NBWs against Kejriwal, others

A Delhi court on Wednesday remained the non-bailable warrants, which were issued against Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, his agent Manish Sisodia and Swaraj India president Yogendra Yadav after they had neglected to show up before it in a criminal maligning grumbling documented in 2013.

Extra Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Samar Vishal passed the request after attorneys for the three heads looked for crossing out of the NBWs.

The court said it will take up the primary issue on April 29.

Sharma, in his protest, had asserted that in 2013 he was drawn closer by volunteers of AAP who had requested that he challenge the Delhi Assembly decisions on a gathering ticket, saying Kejriwal was satisfied with his social administrations.

He topped off the application structure to challenge the surveys subsequent to being told by Sisodia and Yadav that AAP’s Political Affairs Committee had chosen to give him the ticket. In any case, it was later denied to him.

On October 14, 2013, the complainant asserted that articles in driving papers conveyed “slanderous, unlawful and censorious words utilized by the charged people” which have brought down his notoriety in the Bar and the general public.

Contradicting the grumbling, the AAP pioneers had presented that crossing out or portion of a race ticket is the privilege of the gathering and the complainant had not unveiled right data with regards to the bodies of evidence pending against him.

Based on the protest, the preliminary court had before looked for their essence before it in the issue.

It had, be that as it may, conceded safeguard to Kejriwal, Sisodia, and Yadav after they had shown up before it in compatibility to summonses against them.

The summonses were issued on the protest under areas 499, 500 (maligning) and 34 (basic aim) of the IPC, with the preliminary court saying there was by all appearances material to gather the denounced.






Comments are Closed